Mathematical data
Out of fourteen questions out-of cervical cancer tumors testing, female whose rating was indeed ? 10 was basically arbitrarily classified since the having ‘a great knowledge’ or else was indeed regarded as which have “not good studies”. To own expertise in HPV, women whose respond to are ‘never ever heard about HPV’ were omitted in the data away from HPV degree.
Out-of 5 inquiries, feminine whoever get have been ? step 3 were thought to be having ‘good expertise in HPV’ if not once the ‘unhealthy knowledge’. Away from 19 inquiries, feminine whoever get have been ? 13 had been categorized because which have ‘a good overall knowledge’ normally given that ‘unhealthy overall knowledge’.
All the investigation was obtained for the an electronic digital databases and you may reviewed having fun with SPSS V.twenty-six.0 (SPSS, Inc., il, IL, USA). Detailed statistics were utilized to analyze group data and was basically described due to the fact quantity with percentage, imply which have standard departure otherwise average having diversity. The brand new connection ranging from per variable and education get was analyzed playing with simple linear regression. Exploratory model was made during the multivariable study in addition to all variables probably related to the knowledge rating. Brand new noticed quantity of statistical relevance is a great p-property value 0.05 otherwise less.
Show
Away from five hundred women who met introduction criteria and was in fact desired into the research, you to definitely ong 499 ladies who responded to the questionnaire on the training from cervical cancer and you can assessment (region II) and you may information about HPV (region II), one or two failed to promote personal information. Therefore market study were available in merely 497 feminine (Desk 1). The latest indicate chronilogical age of 497 users was age (SD ± ). Over fifty percent of one’s users was basically old Table step one. Socio-financial characteristic (Letter = 497).
This new evidence to possess colposcopy were abnormal cervical cytology which have presence out-of HR-HPV (155; 29.2%), irregular cytology with negative or unfamiliar off Time-Horsepower (274; 55.1%), presence off just Time-HPV (65; thirteen.1%), or only history of CIN (3; 0.6%) (Dining table 2) mænd kvinder slaver.
Predicated on each question about cervical cancer tests (Desk step three), 95.4% away from 499 women misunderstood that female shall be screened for cervical cancer tumors (Q step 1). Everything 55% so you can 70% know when to initiate and you will frequency off assessment (Q 2–4). However, simply 17.4% and you may 36.3%was basically conscious that the latest testing wasn’t required then–immediately after hysterectomy having low-cervical cancers (Q 5) otherwise just after 65 years which have reputation of repeatedly regular prior investigations (Q 6).
Toward methods of evaluating (Q eight–14), 79% off users have been aware there are of a lot assessment procedures (Q seven). Yet not, only eight.2% had studies that cervical evaluating is done at the time regarding pelvic test (Q 8). The participants was indeed used to cervical cytologic comparison (Q ten; 93.8%), HPV research (Q eleven; 89.2%), co-comparison (Q twelve; ninety-five.4%) although not with graphic check immediately after acetic acid (VIA) that was known within just 29.7% (Q 9). Additionally, 57.7% and you may 65.3% off users had misconception one to cervical cancer tumors evaluation is over by the imaging (Q 13) and you may blood test to have tumor indicators (Q 14), correspondingly.
To own expertise in HPV, 110 participants (20.0%) had never observed HPV. One of many kept 389 professionals, majority (ninety five.5%) knew that HPV issues is actually avoidable and 85.1% was indeed conscious that it is avoidable from the vaccination. Whether or not vast majority (ninety.5%) realized you to cervical malignant tumors stems from oncogenic HPV, only about 50 % knew that it could be prevented by steering clear of sexual hobby otherwise venereal wart stems from low-oncogenic HPV.
We analyzed knowledge of the players by score (Desk 4). New indicate countless people to have expertise in cervical disease testing (N = 499) and of HPV (Letter = 389) were ± 2.37 (of 14 inquiries) and you will 3.53 ± 1.eleven (out-of 5 concerns), respectively. By the categorization, 26.9% and you may 20.1% got an effective knowledge of cervical cancer assessment and you may HPV respectively. The newest suggest sum score of knowledge from the cervical malignant tumors examination and you may HPV was basically ± 2.87 (from 19 questions), with just 25.2% got an effective complete studies.